Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Acasti Pharma Inc ACST

Acasti Pharma Inc. is a Canada-based late-stage biopharma company with drug candidates addressing rare and orphan diseases. The Company is targeting three underserved orphan diseases: GTX-104, an intravenous infusion targeting subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), a rare and life-threatening medical emergency, in which bleeding occurs over the surface of the brain in the subarachnoid space between the... see more

Bullboard (NDAQ:ACST)

View:
Comment by Francine01on Jun 22, 2020 1:13pm

RE:RE:RE:TRILOGY 2

My view is that as of today, nobody (no retail shareholders), except management (and friends and families!) knows exactly what happened with T1. We are speculating since January, unfortunately we ...more  
Comment by QualityTeston Jun 22, 2020 11:12am

RE:RE:TRILOGY 2

Walk, Glad you pointed out that this issue isn't necessarily confined to 5 sites. I don't believe it is actually only those 5 sites, but just that those 5 sites had a large % of T1 patients ...more  
Comment by WalkOverTheStrton Jun 22, 2020 9:48am

RE:TRILOGY 2

Danny like te optimism but this assumes that those issues will not be observed in sites outside those 5. Bc we have been kept in the dark on what happened we do not know if the issue/error/lack of ...more  
Comment by hydrocarbsson Jun 20, 2020 6:29pm

RE:TRILOGY 2

Thanks ever so much Danny...pulling the data apart to get our own understanding... From a couple of PRs. As previously reported, the Company noted a highly unusual placebo response in its topline ...more  
Post by Danny1082Manon Jun 20, 2020 5:21pm

TRILOGY 2

281 patients randomized 2.5:1. CaPre dosed would be 200 and placebo 81. The five problem sites represent 12% or 33 patients. If randomized as stated that would be 24 CaPre and 9 placebo. There are 81 ...more  
Comment by Danny1082Manon Jun 20, 2020 1:45pm

RE:Do the Math

Trilogy 1 would have 175 on CaPre and 70 on placebo. So you would need 36 high placebo out of 248 subjects to torpedo the study. How many of the 35 placebo were at those 5 sites? That's the golden ...more  
Comment by Danny1082Manon Jun 20, 2020 1:38pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:Do the Math

Exact reason why the call on the 29th is so important. How many placebo patients were at the site? Could, we hope, a disproportionate amount were from there, or that will be a huge concern
Comment by Danny1082Manon Jun 20, 2020 1:36pm

RE:RE:RE:RE:Do the Math

2.5:1 is full study. Some sites only have a couple of patients
Comment by lscfaon Jun 20, 2020 9:57am

RE:RE:RE:Do the Math

Does each site maintain the 2.5-to-1 ratio or is that a study wide goal? If study is truly double blinded  then ratio may vary from site to site. Did the 5 bad sites have a higher no. of placebo ...more  
Comment by hydrocarbsson Jun 20, 2020 9:57am

RE:RE:RE:RE:Do the Math

Thanks, did this after staying up all night...
Comment by lscfaon Jun 20, 2020 9:42am

RE:RE:RE:Do the Math

    25 Patients   Pacebo      ...more  
Comment by lscfaon Jun 20, 2020 9:34am

RE:RE:Do the Math

Study Description   Go to   Brief Summary: The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of CaPre 4 g daily, compared to placebo, in ...more  
Comment by Danny1082Manon Jun 20, 2020 7:37am

RE:Do the Math

And your assumption I believe is wrong. They take the median, not the average of placebo reduction
Comment by Danny1082Manon Jun 20, 2020 7:35am

RE:Do the Math

I will have to look it up but I thought the number of patients assigned was 2.5:1 for CaPre verses Placebo
Post by hydrocarbsson Jun 20, 2020 6:28am

Do the Math

We aren't given the exact breakdown for the Trilogy 1 trial. So will use approximations. Trilogy 1 enrolled 242 particpants 121 in the placebo          121 in the Capre ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities