Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Active Control Technology Inc ATIVF



GREY:ATIVF - Post by User

Comment by positiveoutlookon Jun 25, 2009 11:39am
180 Views
Post# 16097973

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RC-Note

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RC-NoteI agree wholeheartedly Mitz. My point is I don't think a company like Peabody is going to come out and say Act is chosen for all 30 of their mines. I think it will come mine by mine and yes that could mean more than 1 PO at a time but not the big score we originally expected. or at least I did. I don't think MSHA is going to look at all Peabody's or Magnum's mines in a 1 shot deal. it doesn't mean we won't get all of 1 companies' mines, just that it likely won't be a 1 shot deal.
PS I've been wrong before and hope I'm wrong again.
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse