Adanac Molybdenum Corporation AUAYF

RE: RI Article - How Many More Re- Posts?

[grumpymonkey007]

--->I will say no more than you are catagorically wrong."<---

Ookay Ilerrad, then when you say permitting was all squarded away 21 March are you saying McLeod was lying in February or do you simply have your facts completely and utterly wrong? Case closed.

llerrad4<strong>Reputation</strong>: A calculation of the weighted quality, performance, and participation scores on a scale of one to ten.</p>")">1
3/21/2008 1:19:37 PM | No Recommendation | 16 reads | Post #22807633

I posted here 4 years ago when investors were all worried about permitting. That all fell into place.
https://beta.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?s=&t=&m=22807633&l=0&pd=0&r=0

yukoner1<strong>Reputation</strong>: A calculation of the weighted quality, performance, and participation scores on a scale of one to ten.</p>")">1

2/7/2008 6:01:34 PM | No Recommendation | 29 reads | Post #20154233

[The CEO] adds that a federal review is required which puts the project out for comment under federal guidelines across Canada. McLeod says this teamed with current financial market uncertainty deemed the slow down necessary. (McLeod) “Having this additional regulatory hurdle which we thought was handled during the FACEA(sp) process has thrown a higher level of uncertainty against the financing making it a lot more difficult to foresee"
https://beta.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetailThread.aspx?p=0&m=20154233&r=0