Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Adanac Molybdenum Corporation AUAYF



GREY:AUAYF - Post by User

Comment by grumpymonkey007on Jun 26, 2008 10:55am
299 Views
Post# 15231965

RE: From the Movie....He's back!

RE: From the Movie....He's back!"Some more to the point and conducive to morale and productivity than others , devoid of the inclusion of superfluous negative connotations."

I was simply going to say "six of one, half a dozen of the other" but now I feel compelled to respond in more detail.  'Tis true Waldi, you are far more diplomatic and less critical of those who you trust your money to than I am.  I expect action, clarity of communication and accountability from companies I put my hard earned pesos into.  Typically I consider the CEO to be unltimately responsible for the performance of their company.

Competency to perform one's role is paramount to ensuring a successful operation.  There's nothing emotive about my use of the term competency - it's simply the combination of one's skills, experience and education.  There's no doubt the man is good at what he does - and now he's in the right position for his skillset/experience/education.

A great engineer is not necessarily a great CEO, nor is a great CEO necessarily a great engineer.  The board made their decision and I'm guessing their language was far more similar to mine than it was to your's.

BTW - there's nothing superfluous in my post.  Nor is it overly negative.  The man is now holding a lesser position where his talents will shine.

It is a position with less responsibility right?
He has the competency to perform the engineering consultancy role he is now in right?
The company's performance to date has left a little  to be desired in the realm of investor communication, financing, and permitting right?  Would you hold the CEO responsible for that?
Bullboard Posts