Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum AvenEx Energy Corp AVNDF

GREY:AVNDF - Post Discussion

AvenEx Energy Corp > I say yeah!
View:
Post by jjeerryy on Feb 11, 2013 2:23pm

I say yeah!

I voted YES on 3,300 shares.

 

I feel the AVF board knows AVF was doomed therefore this is the best they could get although lining their pockets on the way out.  It could have been worse they could have declined the merger and let AVF go bankrupt.

 

Think about it!

Comment by Kingscourt on Feb 11, 2013 2:44pm
So if I understand you correctly, the board is fully aware this ship is sinking and they feel no obligation to inform us shareholders (a.k.a. company owners) about the situation while they take their payouts and jump ship and you are ok with this? I feel strongly management had forgotten their role and obligations to all of us and by the sounds of it, many of you are ok with this. Would it have ...more  
Comment by Al42 on Feb 11, 2013 2:52pm
New 52 week low today, maybe by the time of the vote we'll be below a buck!! And nothing from the Idiots running the company. What a JOKE
Comment by Joe454 on Feb 11, 2013 3:01pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by jjeerryy on Feb 11, 2013 4:19pm
So if I understand you correctly Kingcourt, you have ignorantly twisted my words.   I said "I feel" not I know.   May the bird of paradise fly up your nose.   After that drop on your ignorant head! 
Comment by Kingscourt on Feb 11, 2013 5:29pm
No need for mud slinging pal. I will chalk it up to a bad mood from Montreal's 6-0 spanking the other night ;) We are all in this one together. I was simply trying to highlight that weather the merger will benefit us remains to be seen, however, the way Avenex management went about the business of the merger, was unacceptable and if we carry on as business as usual, we are sending a very bad ...more  
Comment by eusdond on Feb 12, 2013 10:28am
I'll echo your comments... This management team is nothing but a bunch of two bit shysters who have done some shady dealing behind the shareholders back and now think the shareholders are dumb enough to go along with it ?   I'm down $ 10,000.00 USD on this stock but I will loose all of it before I will vote to line those crooks pockets  at the shareholders expense...
Comment by rad10 on Feb 12, 2013 10:35am
true.  I am looking forward to the special dividend from the sale of ER when this unravels.  Should be around a buck a share.................   That's something everyone can enjoy.................................
Comment by pwalk140 on Feb 12, 2013 11:33am
Actually I'd say that if the deal doesn't go through due to Avenex that the sale of ER would simply be used to pay for the non-completion fee of 2.5% of it's enterprise value to the other two parties...or did you miss that part in the disclosures???  
Comment by rad10 on Feb 12, 2013 12:45pm
LOL - you so funny!! non completion fee is usually triggered in the event of a third party bidding for the company and scuttling the deal.  It is a way of keeping other offers at bay    Besides the vote is failing at the PACE side of things.   Under YOUR incorrect scenario - Pace may well be paying Avenex! I would urge you to review the document - page 109 / 110:   The non ...more  
Comment by deisman on Feb 12, 2013 1:11pm
I don't think thats the case but just point me to the applicable clause where it says that a shareholder "no" vote  constitutes one of those "certain circumstances" "agreed to pay Charger a non-completion fee of $0.85 million and Pace a non-completion fee of $3.65 million if the Arrangement is not completed under certain circumstances"    
Comment by deisman on Feb 12, 2013 2:32pm
AvenEx's proxy solicitation agent, Laurel Hill Advisory Group at  1-877-452-7184 just confirmed my view and there would be $0 owing to the other two companies if the shareholders vote down the merger.  But, if all other conditions are met (yes vote) and the Elbow River transaction does not go through, Avenex would be responsible for the non-completion fee. (if CHX & PCE don't ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities
USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse