RE: RE: Mineweb article..Snowden Checking Figures Yes if the board is having Snowden review the calculation and methodology - I think that eliminates the possibiliy of mass fraud betweeen Peter George and Frank C. I never thought that existed ever but it had been mentioned quite a few times. Also look at the picture of Peter, NO WAY, Does that guy commit fraud! Talk about not fitting the profile.
If I had to guess the drill results are entered into the computer software via a data dump, so I doubt that the drill results are not accurately entered into the model and even then I am sure they are tripple checked. I am taking that out of the equation.
So now you have left is just geological interpretation, with a guy that has done a fair number of 43-101s in his 45 years. Norm Anderson reviewed his interpretation and agreed, which makes me think you are actually safer on this 43-101 then on most issued. This just happens to be a big one. Think about Norm's creduentials.
So once you break down the elements piece by piece it definatley derisks this. $5, $10, $20 who knows but one thing is for certain the current share price represents the fear of a company with a wild and zanie CEO that did not do a 43-101 in a long period of time. I think all is good just the market needs its report.