Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:[COW Permits]

[boss_waz]

yaponski wrote:

Boss,
In summary, I am saying that permitting of New Prosperity is probably a necessary condition for permiting at Cow Mountain. We seem to agree on this point.  

But permitting of New Proeperity is far from sufficient to result in automatic permitting of Cow Mountain. The env studies have to be done at CM and that is far from started let alow complete. Yet, my interpretation of what you were trying to slide past here in an effort to pump up BMG value in the minds of potential investors was that NP permit --> CM permit.  To this I say, CM is done far from sufficeint work to even warrant a consideration for permitting let alone granting of permits.  And the env work takes time (lots of that) and money (problem houston... funds are being drained each month just meeting the builtin overheads in the company operations let alone producing gold to pay back Sprott)....

Do I have that about right, would you say :)

Further, thanks for taking the time to respond....would be nice to hear opinions of others.....
Regarding 'hope'....
- I like what I read in the Snowden resource documents...
- I like the mention of production in the cover letter for the agm (in writing)...
- I am anxious to read the updated resource document when it is completed and published....

- I dislike the videos with FC making claims about business progress etc (re: trucks are rolling; QAQC completion etc)...and I vow never to trust the information provided in this format again...(ie not in writing)...(shame on me).