RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Txs for the emails Roller LOL B-O-R-I-S YAPOOPHEAD
yes of course without the meddling mgmt and poison pill BGM's 6-10M oz open pit deposit in HISTORIC barkerville will attract big interest , heck even the tax credits alone will cover sprotts loan .... Shells have sold for more !
BORIS you stupid fuk
borisYaponski]
bigbab wrote: Hey DUMB DUMB
each company takes there own unique situation into any creditor protection situation , assets, debts, liabilities etc
If only I could slow down my english for you to comprehend.....
E-X-P-L-A-I-N T-H-E- P-R-O-C-E-S-S
(AND PLEASE EXPLAIN THE SCENARIO WHERE SPROTT MAGICALLY GETS THE WHOLE COMPANY ...need a good laugh)
Someone needs to slap you sternly across the face
Captain,
Are you just natuarlly stupid or are you trying to be difficult here? Read what I've already posted or else shut your big fat pie hole.
Short story version is a creditor initiates action and the company seeks protection of the courts. Yes, every case has unique details. But it won't be the first time a broken stream has resulted in a company restructuring and shareholders getting wiped out.
Your spreadchit worksheet might show lots of value in the company but in the real world, holdings are only worth what someone will pay for them. Do you believe your spreadchit work is going to admisable in court?
And last time I checked there isn't a long line of customers looking to buy tailing ponds in British Columbia Indian lands. Or am I wrong... are the hotels in Barkerville filed with geos from the majors having a look at BGM properites... you certainly were spreading that false story in the past and yet nothing ever came of that did it... :)
It is interesting that you are already working up positive spin for what I've been calling a likely event for months if not years.... court controlled restructing to satisfy unfunded liabilities... and the eventual wipe out of existing shareholders in the restructured oompany...
[/quote]