RE:RE:Response to fuzzy, and for everybody else, tooWouldn't being sued be interesting, eh, fuzzy? I'd get to look at the communications between everybody.
So, I take it that you are now supporting Rathjen. Good for you. She needs a friend, even one like you.
I will be getting far more agressive, fuzzy. I'm already making a good case, whether you can understand the nuances of the case or not. And everything I'm saying is interpretation of publicly disclosed information. It's not a solid case, fuzzy. It's not being presented as one. It's amazing how much can discerned from 460 pages of public filings. But my guess is that you don't have the bandwidth for it.
Anyway, maybe you should give your own interests a thought. For instance, how much would you take to forget about voting against a buyout?
jd