RE:ONLY ONE
Say marq ... while your playing games, why don't you continue on that same thread ... say something like the following ... What is the difference between First Nations and Native Americans? (Blood line - please - not the 47th or 48th degree N. latitude [or was the longitude?].) Add how far back does (if) these genealogical lines go? If I understand correctly, some tribes (Families/relatives/friends) claim that their ancestors were descendant from the great bears (Brown, Black, & White). Others claim they came from otters, or beavers, or etc. Others claim the Birds like Geese or Eagles. I think that this latter group is most correct as they seem to just fly around establishing families where ever they went. By the way when and how were the "boundaries" set up by these tribes? By peaceful negotiation or by strength of arm and straightness of the flight of an arrow? Certainly not by the current worth of gold. And, I bet that the boundaries changed often from place to place due to weather, where the blue berries grew the best each season, and where horns in velvet were in plenty each fall. Or, was it because of the better looking of the darlings within another tribe and which the "leaders" desired to mother their offspring (what did I just say about the worth of gold?). And, does a duck know when they fly back and forth a-crossed the 48th parallel when out for a fly around, or seeking a mate (except those damn green heads who don't give a quack for the genealogy of any female quack who will put out to/for him), or out trying to find a warmer place to hang out for a few months. Lastly, why doesn't the First Nations sue the Native Americans (or vice versa) to get their "fair share" of all the oil, minerals, and Casino wampum raised by their southern/northern cousins. The present day international courts would welcome them! Historically speaking, IN FACTO, "the losers" were no longer the ones who talked from the position of strength. Just the opposite, they were subject to ... you know the rest of the story.