CAT STORY- Dec2 and EXPERTSDecember,
I am surprised at your comments about Grandich and reference to "pump". Doesn't sound like you own any shares anymore, as you were a supporter of the stock for a long while. I was thinking some of your comments in summer when Staccato was finding a support level in .50 and .40's were good points for newer pm share owners. ....Oh well.
The poster who with
BIG CAPITALS sounded a warning "GRANDICH PUMP" and to beware doesn't own any shares, he just thought he would pass along his 2 cents whether we asked or not? Great stuff....just what I need, some guy sitting at his computer with no experience in gold or pm shares, but stating to me what Grandich said even before he started talking about Staccato, that he was employed by them. And what is flashed around the world in a news release just a few weeks ago. Pfft........ But I guess because nobody covers his particular junior shares, it is incumbent apon him to warn us of a perceived fact that we must not know because we are not as smart at spotting the obvious???? Anyway, that discussion is a waste of time.
I am sure you know this, so that is why I am surprised at your comments. If gold letter writers put their name on a particular stock, you can bet, their subscription clients will hold them accountable. Not only that....the facts and supportive information given as to the reason the particular analyst suggests buying the stock, is credible, and based on alot of pm sector experience. If more than one gold analyst says same thing, well that is good. If 3 say basically the same thing, well that is very unusual. Now if 4 say basically the same......??? Hey, I am not a mathematics major, but in MHO and many years of experience in gold, I would say that is extremely unusual for a junior. Note that I am not including Doug Casey just now as the 5th bullish review on Staccato, as he has not publicly said anything lately. That would be a
ROYAL FLUSH
While Grandich review on CAT is interesting, there are higher profile writers saying the same bullish things about Staccato unless this obvious fact escapes some of the
non shareowners who feel they need to warn us Staccato shareholders. It seems to me, that the highest profile of the gold analysts who are currently
"recommending" Staccato and by the way..risk some credibility by doing so are:
1.
Jay Taylor - who was keynote speaker at a recent investment conference, which I posted on this BB ( Grandich was there also but not as a headliner)
2.
Larry Roulston - who is a geologist by profession and commands a large degree of respect within the pm sector. Larry also does not do alot of public writing or promoting.
3.
Brien Lundin who has been a gold analyst and newsletter writer since 1971 near the beginning of the last gold bull market.
4.
Doug Casey - who has not written up Staccato lately, but was alerting his subscribers last year to the CAT story. Casey does not accept payments or cannot be contacted to write up a company. He only does analysis on shares he decides. Casey is one of the largest subscription followings in resources and commodities in North America.
So..... are all these gold analysts pumpers? How many gold analysts follow some of the junior pm shares you own? Or all those great ideas via symbols mentioned here by visiting posters?
Lets face it, in an anomymous setting like SH BB's many people are not honest and information is not 100% reliable. Those seeking reliable investment info for stock decisions should call the companies they research and ask qualified people, not bullboard personalities with no names or addresses or faces.
So that is MHO and and more time than I wanted to spend on computer tonight.
cheers and best wishes to all shareholders new and old
