RE: The Past is Priced InWell said Snow.
I believe Northguru is correct. MO shares were not sold in the market. My guess was a personal restucture of his personal assets - why - BO issues perhaps???
Geocat - your last statement in light of Northguru's post leaves me wondering what your real intentions are.
Oregold - I agree with most of your issues, some that have been bothering me too, and some you have enlightened me too.
I do understand, though, there is a supposed methodology to this madness - Empire to generate revenue in the short term to fund Victory and potentially exposing the real size of Titan as opposed to selling of Titan to fund Victory - can MO pull it off ????? Time will tell.
Player - you are so correct about reflecting on the past, and Northguru is correct about moving forward. I am not a fan of MO because of the past - but I will credit him with what I think has been some key moves on re-establishing some credibility.
But at the same time the flow of information continues to bother me. And the lack of key information when there are releases.
I have lost more money than I would ever admit playing these juniors, but at the end of the day this is one gamble I willing to take. Victory could be a dud, Empire a waste of time, and titan sitting idle indefinitely - and the outcome for RGZ, like most juniors, drift till someone needs a shell or ............most here should be quite familiar with that scenario.
Not too far down to hit bottom, but lots of room to move up. Would not take much. So I buy RGZ stock instead of lottery tickets - I thinks the odds are better.
No question, cup is half empty
but it is also half full
Jeff