RE:RE:Jabil/FutureI'm anxious to learn how much of the latest private placement was taken by insiders. If it is a token representation, then I'll be disappointed. It was positive that the placement was substantially over-subscribed on the first day. I don't like the additional dilution of stock, but I do like that it was seen as attractive.
The here and now issue is to begin a consistent revenue stream from the company owned plant. Securing feedstock, successfully processing it at the expected TPD, generating revenue in the expected range, etc. Although ETI believes it has proven the technology, potential partners may need real world proof and the successful operation of the plant should provide that proof.
That in itself should hopefully stabilize the stock and let it get a higher speculative premium back into it. However, to move the price significant higher, IN MY VIEW, is to sign the first deal with a prominent partner to license the technology. On the e-waste side of the business, the licensing of the technology is best growth path. Little to no capital is required, just collect the ongoing revenue stream from the partner(s).
The other potential revenue streams (traditional mining, insitu mining) are probably further down the road, although positive news on those fronts would also help.
In regards to the CC market, who knows where ETI stands now. I have not talked to IR since the day it was first announced that Mineworx no longer needs ETI.