RE:RE:RE:RE:I am quite optimistic
megacopper wrote:
Crashcomingsoon wrote: They reported that the deep deposits were eye-shaped ovoids. Do iron deposits have this characteristic ?
Well I think this entire eye shaped magnetic structure talk came from the Nova like magnetic eye like feature at Nova Bollinger nickel deposit in Australia. There was some reference made by a prior operator at Gochager that it had a similar magnetic signature. This is what they thought at the time but that operator was more focused on lithium at the time and optioned the property off.
Current analyses of the available geophysical data (airborne and ground surveys) for the Gochager Lake area reveal for the first time a striking “EYE” shaped conductivity and lesser so magnetic pattern engulfing the deposit. This phenomenon is similar to the “EYE” like geophysical patterns associated with the recent discovery of the Nova-Bollinger nickel mining camp in the Fraser Range, Australia where the “EYE” feature identifies new high priority targets in which conductive Ni-Cu bodies lie within the “EYE” feature.
I should add (to answer your question) that at Albert Lake with the recent drilling that I was excited about they encountered mostly Pyrrhotite or FeS which is an iron sulphide and yes it is conductive but unfortunately it usually contains low concentrations of nickel and copper. However near the contact which these iron sulphides at Albert Lake sometimes in the past they hit the more favourable dense net textured mineralization found at the original Rottenstone deposit. It appears that based on the visuals they didn't hit that this time around. So I'm going to stop talking about it now and move on to Gochager. Oh my. Anomalies are like a**holes, everyone has got one. So true unfortunately.
The Gochager nickel deposits appear to be in a different geological setting and these iron sulphides shouldn't be the cause of the conductors or at least we hope not. Lol