RE:Avacta?Avacta thoughts, the test is expensive and slow and can not help in many situations. From the time the test is given to the time when the results are available from the lab would depend on how many tests and the limit to the Spectrometer, they also have to match the test with the person and make sure that they do not mix it up or lose the test all together in transit costing almost $200 and 2 to 4 hours. Tracking the hot spots in this method would be ineffective and hard to coordinate.
Sona method includes proprietary nanotechnology to derive results within 5-20 mins on site without a lab and can be administered by a layperson and costing around $50 in all, and map hot zones much more efficient when paired up with Bond. IMO.