Frogzilla wrote: pooIman wrote: Yes Mike paid very well for doing very little with TAAT>Next finnacials will prove this point
Finacials are important, and certainly the easiest way to tell where a company has been financially, but there's a lot more to a company then 1+1=2!
If the finacial reports were the only thing that matters, then traders & investors would buy & sell each stocks 4 times a year, but it just doesn't work that way!
You have learned & know virtually nothing about TAAT, all you think you know comes from a financial report, that every investors see's, so your not special!!
Making investment desicions solely on financial numbers is a dangerous way to invest, because these are past numbers! You can have blowout financial numbers on the up side, but if that company loses all its big accounts or is involved in a law suit that halts revenues, do you wait for the next financials to react!
You completely ignore current company events and your posts are proof of this statement, 50% of your posts are in regards to your understanding and interpretation of financials 3 months ago, the other 50% is man crush & dumpydoo!
If financial reports were the only thing that mattered, professional money managers would work 4 weeks/times a year, but as most of us know, that's just not how it works!
Ribbit
PS: You posted MIKE had "ZERO" executive experience in a publically traded small cap company, YOU WERE 100% WRONG! You also said MIKE only had large cap experience, again 100% WRONG!