RE:RE:Cant believe anyone is still here You are completely missing the point and don't get marijuana confused with hemp. People smoke marijuana because it makes them high. There is no benefit or reason to smoke hemp. I know you will argue that but it's true. There have been numerous companies over my career who have tribal hemp cigs, herbal cigs etc, but 100% of them have failed because you clearly don't understand there is no "hook". With cigs, the hook is nicotine. Inhaling combustion on anything is NOT good for you, hence the concept of Iqos created by Philip Morris, NO combustion.
my point is Taat or any other hemp or herbal company has NO hook and hence NO consumer base. You can argue you with me all you want but proof will be in the pudding when this comes to an end and trust me it will. Now what may happen, is consumers will use Taat to help reduce their cig addiction.m, especially with the price point. I can buy into that argument and hence there could be a base for Taat there, but never will a cig consumer switch 100% to Taat vrs just quiting once the hook of nicotine is gone.
So now the question is, if smokers use Taat as a secondary product to cut their nicotine addiction down and reduce money spent, what's the size of that market? Not sure it will be big enough to sustain a business around, but maybe I am wrong. Just doesn't look that way in taat revenues SO FAR