RE:RE:RE:OuchBateman please make this point clear! And please proof your source. BaitingBateman wrote: Profitability was projected in Y1, 5 q's down and their still a ways off. Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard?symbol=c.tgif&postid=29146574#Qc16mMMiWVLS0EOD.99
BaitingBateman wrote: TGIF is literally AMA & Infused, well, atleast 91% of them. A $3m loss cetainly isn't attributed to Spire.
Point is, if you're subsidiaries were profitble, Parent Co. would be profitable.
Profitability was projected in Y1, 5 q's down and their still a ways off. Q2 certainly won't be much better.
ClarenceSwoon wrote: Brayden said that AMA and Infused are profitable and 1933 will be "soon".
Patrick2Bateman wrote: Market isn't going to like these financials. Big loss... Brayden said they would be profitable this Q, did he not? Or does he mean this Q (Q2?)
BATEMAN