Chalice Brands Ltd CHALF

The aliases of a vendetta

[PortlandBlazer]

Common writing styles suggest there are multiple aliases for one unhappy poster.
RebeccaG, Boddington, TheCanadianDude and Justforkeks all share some common idiotsyncracies:

• Post deliberately wrong information over and over, such as “Debt is 68 x equity”. Current actual debt is 1.3 x equity, calculated from financial statements filed with regulators here: www.SEDAR.com.  This isn’t a mistake by the Poster, he’s been corrected kindly before. This is deliberate disinformation.
• Cite obscure websites with zero legal responsibility and claim their work represents “analysis”.
• Claim the history from a half decade ago, when Longacre was renamed Golden Leaf or when management was changed in 2019, has any relevance to valuation today.
• Attribute a false narrative to those who share documented facts, in an effort to discredit reality. PortlandBlazer has never said, “Buy”. I have advocated that investors do their own diligence from source documents. That sunlight is toxic to Poster.

A valid question is, “Why?”.

1. Studying the multiple posts by multiple aliases, Poster seems focused on this one company. Some of the aliases are new like Justforkeks, but all the aliases post on only one company: Chalice. This suggests a disgruntled ex-employee with a vendetta. Nothing else would explain the focused attack on truth, hard work and legitimate financial progress. But the truths are plain to see for anyone who reads the financial statements: storecounts, revenues and margins, both overall and per share outstanding, are growing.
2. Why doesn’t management stop this nonsense? As we’ve seen, a scammer can create new aliases as fast as cockroaches can be squished. CHAL has shared information through Stockhouse directly in the past. I have to assume there is some business information dialogue, or even a business relationship. So I assume CHAL knows the identity behind the aliases, and if there was wealth behind the aliases, could sue for libel for the value destruction caused by Poster. The amount of damages could be alleged to be in the tens of millions of dollars, and the suit would cost each side hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight. But if Poster has no net worth, there’s no reason to spend the management time and resources.

The best defense against a scammer is to hang up. Read the actual facts filed with the securities regulators. Unless Poster starts bringing real facts, not “alt facts”, Poster has to be assumed to be on a toxic mission driven by personal vendetta.

[TheRealCanaDude]

Your post makes a lot of sense. If he's short selling, and he's been spreading deliberate misinformation, that's a definite short and distort. Indeed short selling has been occuring on the OTC, if those sales could be tied back to his posts, then it's a definite criminal matter.   

[420Chronic420]

You can say whatever you want. But RebeccaG, Boddington, TheCanadianDude and Justforkeks,  Have only been correct and this stock is tanking fast.

[TheRealCanaDude]

did you miss the part where they're lying a lot of the time?

[PortlandBlazer]

That's as specious as the lie about the debt equity ratio being 68. "They're right about the value BECAUSE they've driven down the share price." When the PRICE is below the VALUE, investors should buy. The Poster has not evidenced any ability to assess VALUE and is only committed to relentless misinformation. This jig is up.

[Boddington]

Wall Street Journal Debt Ratios after Q3 I guess there are idiots that don't understand facts. https://www.wsj.com/market-data/quotes/CHALF/financials Capital Structure Total Debt to Total Equity 204.19 Total Debt to Total Capital 67.13 Total Debt to Total Assets 39.88 Interest Coverage -2.29 Long-Term

[PortlandBlazer]

[PortlandBlazer]

You do know that you have to put a % symbol after these numbers. Quoting them out of context is deceitful. Refer to financial statements, and actually do the work on your calculator to divide debt by equity. It's not difficult.

[Boddington]

You are born to be a moron Blazer DE ratio has NO %. It is a straight quotient  \DE ratio is 68 DE ratio says for EVERY $1 CHALICE owns, it owes $68 in debt You missed your meds

[RebeccaG]

Embarrassing Blazer when you give yourself thumbs up from your other alias therealcanadiandude. But, regardless, these financials posted by the Wallstreet Journal are official and are audited 5 times before being made public The Net financials are a disaster and you can see the DE ratio properly listed as 68. There are NO percentages in the DE calculation and it is either stupidity or pretending