Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Chinook Energy Inc. Common CNKEF



GREY:CNKEF - Post by User

Post by Don2018on Nov 07, 2019 10:35pm
94 Views
Post# 30325137

Compare to VII

Compare to VIIVII's condensate is about 65% of their total liquids production, CKE looks to be about 50%. 
That is important because condensate was worth about $65bbl in Q3 while other liquids were almost worthless, at $3.

But the big factor is that VII produces about 230 barrels of liquids for every mmcf, while CKE produces about 29.

Now I know that VII is the best in the business, but it remains an important consideration.
With all of the struggling natural gas producers that have similar production metrics to CKE, how many potential buyers will be willing to buy their assets? They certainly will be unlikely to offer much of a premium.
JMO
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse