CannTrust Holdings Inc CNTTQ

RE:RE:i don't believe trst will lose its license

[goldman777]

xXMKBXx wrote: The more I read and learn from all the information out there I am inclined to agree with you. If there is any doubt that HC can shoulder partial blame for this, it drastically reduces the fair repercussions they can impose.

The only thing I would like to see more information on is this “Whistle blower” with regards to this fake wall business. I find it extremely unlikely that management would not know about this, IF such a thing even occurred. I would very much like to know what would happen to this individual if his allegations are false.

- Cheers

The fake walls allegation and the reason for them "to intentionally hide from HC " really seems far fetched to me. Why would senior management with years of regulatory knowledge trust such a peon with an illegal task like this, would they risk their careers and possible criminal charges by letting a low level mole actually perform this alledged illegal procedure. The more I think about it the more convinced I am that there is an alternative motive on behalf of the whistle blower and  I would think the company will file charges once cleared of the defammatory allegations. Either way, if someone did give the green light to the walls being installed I`m sure it wasn`t someone too far up the ladder and the CEO may not even have been aware of it - always the last to know scenario. On going construction and contamination concerns will likely be cited if these poly walls were indeed erected. I wouldn`t want to be the whistle blower at this stage of the game. Expect a major snap back to the $7.00 + rangs once the dust settles.