GREY:COLUF - Post by User
Comment by
benbolaon Sep 23, 2013 4:48pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
324 Views
Post# 21761105
RE:RE:Doing some DD on this company and found this.........
RE:RE:Doing some DD on this company and found this.........I am not familiar with the circumstances which led to the revised 75/25 split which the activist/upstart Coomigasp leadership is now rejecting.
1. What was the context which led to the revision? Higher start-up costs? Improved up-front benefits for Coomigasp members?
2. Did Coomigasp members have a vote for it? Does their charter require one?
3. Are there any specific claims of wrongdoing, aside from "the original terms were 50/50 and we don't accept the revised income splitting arrangement"?
Really what I am digging for is an answer to this question: are there reasonable grounds to believe that the current contract (75/25 split) was implemented illegally, in bad faith, or in breech of standard and mutually agreed upon protocols?