GREY:COSLF - Post by User
Comment by
HyperCubeon Feb 09, 2018 7:21pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
37 Views
Post# 27537028
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:VcQ RPB valued at zero
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:VcQ RPB valued at zeroHe probably meant metric tonne. But mt can't mean megatonne. A megatonne would be Mt, mt would be for millitonne. A millitonne is a weird way of writting a kg.
Co2Harvest wrote: If this is what they have, I gotta wonder why they aren't talking about it. CW is that what you meant by mt???
james30 wrote: A megatonne? as in 1,000,000 tonnes? When carbon credits are $50/tonne, and CST's cost is $28/tonne (from the research paper), that's net $22/tonne.
You're saying one of those units would net $22,000,000 in carbon credits?