GREY:CPYCF - Post by User
Comment by
chrisaleon Aug 08, 2012 1:41pm
76 Views
Post# 20194976
RE: 88% Met Coal 12% Thermal...
RE: 88% Met Coal 12% Thermal... I did post the link to that report did I not... anyway, thanks for posting the full text.
I'm not twisting anything. I'm taking a direct quote from the report that has direct implications on the operation of the mine:
Alternatively, all of the Raven washed product could be marketed as a high-quality thermal coal with average product specifications of 7,000 kcal/kg and 15 percent ash on a dry basis. Given this, the process plant has been designed with the flexibility to produce metallurgical coal, with a thermal middlings coal by-product or alternatively a high-quality thermal coal.
So I ask AGAIN (3rd time lucky?):
If they intend to ONLY sell 88/12 met/middlings why do they use the word "Alternatively" twice referring to both what the "all of the Raven washed product" could be used for and how "the process plant" will be designed?
How many times must I ask a question to you 2guys before getting a straight answer rather than more accusations of lying and misleading people. This is a simple question. Answer it.