Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining... see more

GREY:CPYCF - Post Discussion

Compliance Energy Corp > Why this project cannot proceed
View:
Post by chrisale on Jul 04, 2012 3:48pm

Why this project cannot proceed

Facts on why this mine should not and cannot proceed and why it will be resisted:

#1: No, it's not needed.  True metallurgical coking coal is not what this mine would produce.  Period.  At best 60% of the produced coal will be suitable for mixing into metallurgical applications (sub-bituminous) to lower the price for steel makers.  At worst, the mine will sell 100% of its coal to the thermal power generation market, which is absolutely unacceptable.  

#2: No, the studies done are not enough.  Despite its starry-eyed press-releases, the only company (AMEC) used for environmental study has been under the direction of no one but the company itself.  This is not 'independant' and forms the basis of the concern of the BC Shellfish Growers Association which employs 3 times the amount of people as Raven will.

#3: No commmitment outside of "paying taxes" has been given by the company to invest in the transportation infrastructure to move this coal to market.  Be it road or rail, it is clear they expect the taxpayer, and only the taxpayer, to foot the bill both for any upgrades or new construction that needs to be done, and also the maintenance that will come afterward as the traffic produce degrades the infrastructure.

#4: The Port of Port Alberni is not ready to handle this volume.  Despite efforts by local leaders to have the facilities moved out of the city centre so as to not affect local business, tourism and housing prices, the company has shown no willingness to support that initiative outside of lip service.

#5: Climate Change.  Fact is, it doesn't matter if 'it produces steel for cars".  We need to build less cars, and use less steel if we want to mitigate and adapt to climate change.  That is the simple fact.

I would hope anyone with an ethical bent who has chosen to support this coalmine by buying its stock reconsiders.  There are so many other industries to support with good paying jobs that will actually move Vancouver Island and all of humanity forward instead of holding it back.

And to the fellow who thought the idea of using wood/charcoal for coking coal was unsustainable.  Anything is unsustainable if not used responsibly (the current log export regime being a perfect example).  Coal doesn't reproduce itself, wood does.

Just imagine how many jobs this province would have if we actually used our renewable resources to make things rather than simply export them as quickly as possible and faster than we can replace them.

Comment by 2guys on Jul 04, 2012 4:24pm
chrisale, this project can proceed if CEC abides by the regulations set out in the AIR/EIS and only if they can will it proceed.   Nothing you or I say on this board will effect what the panel decides.   Of course you and your friends can litter the streets with propoganda leaflets, throw feces at business people, rant and rave and bang on Steel pots and pans, curse and whatever else you ...more  
Comment by chrisale on Jul 04, 2012 5:15pm
You seem to not understand where the buck stops.  The Ministers.  While it the EA process is good, it is unfortunately: a) based on flawed and incomplete concepts particularly when it comes to fossil fuels b) is a "recommendation" mechanism and nothing else.  It is beholden to the wishes of the Ministers and Cabinet that make the final decisions. You're right nothing ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities