Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining... see more

GREY:CPYCF - Post Discussion

Compliance Energy Corp > Water and Food Trump Coal Mines
View:
Post by WileyCoyote1 on Mar 15, 2013 9:36pm

Water and Food Trump Coal Mines

CEC understimates the power of the opposition.  In addition to the 5089 signatures obtained in opposition to the mine, the local councils of Courtenay, Comox and Cumberrland as well as the Regional District have signed on saying the mine should not proceed without comprehensive aquifer mapping and a joint review panel with public hearings.  I am certain that CEC couldn't even get a thousand local signaures in support of this mine.  At risk are local drinking water and a sustainable shellfish industry which employs 600 people.  The community of Fanny Bay is already suffering because no one wants to live downstream from a coalmine.  This is a gorgeous community which is run by volunteers.  The mine would destroy the community because if it goes through, people will move away.  Along with those citizens would go our volunteer fire department, people who work at the community hall, salmon enhancement, Streamkeepers,Lions Club, the Old Age Pensioner's Hall, Youth and family programs. 

All over the world, people are having problems with obtaining fresh water.  It makes no sense polluting the small amount of water we have left.  Of all the water in the world, 97.2% is ocean, 2.15% is ice, 0.65% is fresh water, and of that 0.65%, only 2.5% is potable.  That  is why we fight to protect our water.  With 127,500m3 of methane gas being produced by Raven per day, it is not improbable to think that coalbed methane extraction would also be on the horizon if this mine went through.  This would surely mean game over for the community watershed.  Water will one day be the most precious resource we have.  Some of us know that already, but many have not realized it yet.

Comment by 2guys on Mar 16, 2013 6:55am
Wiley you said, "the local councils of Courtenay, Comox and Cumberrland as well as the Regional District have signed on saying the mine should not proceed without comprehensive aquifer mapping."   Could you tell us exactly which location Compliance failed to test?  CEC has performed aquifer tests in 43 different locations since 2009.  Which one have they missed that those ...more  
Comment by mokita on Mar 19, 2013 12:36pm
2guys, you need to read opposition scientific reports more carefully and avoid the big lie which is repeating the same phrase that lacks any scientific support so often that you believe it; ie, clean coal and BC's rigorous EAO process.  Issues w/ CEC studies is they are done by AMEC, hired to get mines thru corrupted review processes and as reported by West Coast Law Clinic and a truly ...more  
Comment by 2guys on Mar 19, 2013 3:05pm
mokita you said, "you need to read opposition scientific reports more carefully and avoid the big lie which is repeating the same phrase that lacks any scientific support".   I'm going by the work that the scientists have done per the Raven website on hydrology and aquifer testing in 43 different locations since 2009.   If there's scientific work that has been  ...more  
Comment by mokita on Mar 19, 2013 6:44pm
2guys, just in case you are interested in scientific data and evidence that counters your faith in CEC "science" and credibility here is a llink to a recent US government study that admits AMD is the industry's greatest unresolved issue and that predictions using state of the art industry models and studies fail.  Google Acid Mine Drainage and Effects on Fish ...more  
Comment by 2guys on Mar 19, 2013 9:29pm
That's a good point mokita, and one you should also bring up at the public comments.   I think that what this means is that the EA process is inadequate.  Show this proof and hopefully the government will enact stricter guidelines for all existing and potential to be permitted mines.  GL
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities