Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining Project (Raven Project).


GREY:CPYCF - Post by User

Post by coalbadon Jul 11, 2012 1:26pm
123 Views
Post# 20102938

Raven Project PAH Feasibility Report

Raven Project PAH Feasibility Report

If you examine the "Technical Report" posted June 8, 2011, by CEC consultants PAH, there's a lot of wording that would suggest more information is needed to make the  feasibility study  complete. 

"Mining studies are largely complete to bankable feasibility level; however, work in some areas is still ongoing ( Page 20.1)

"Areas of uncertainty in engineering design that must be resolved to FINALIZE the bankable feasibility include the following: reject geochemistry to determine if reject material is potentially acid-generating; groundwater inflows and geochemistry to determine underground water managment; water treatment requirements, if necessary. (Pages 20.1)

This mine is being proposed on the basis of reserves that are not proven, as 51% of the coal that is expected to be extracted falls into the "probable", not "proven category as indicated by Table 17-4 on Page 17.12 of the PAH Report. This should be concerning and signal a need for a risk assessment on the effect of running into unanticipated geological complexities that will be detrimental to the project's economics and it's ability to fulfill committments on mitigating environmental impacts. 

BOTTOM LINE: A lot more information needs to be published so investors can make an educated decision on the merits of this project. In my humble opinion.....

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse