Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining Project (Raven Project).


GREY:CPYCF - Post by User

Comment by 2guyson Aug 08, 2012 9:54pm
97 Views
Post# 20196747

RE: RE: RE: RE: 88% Met Coal 12% Thermal...

RE: RE: RE: RE: 88% Met Coal 12% Thermal...

I'm not sure what the flip flopping is on your part chrisale, but you implied CEC would be selling all thermal, which just isn't the case.

 

Being able to and doing are two different things.

 

Met Coal can be sold for energy, but not Thermal for steel production.

 

Sure, if thermal prices were to move higher than met coal or semi-soft met coal prices, then CEC would be stupid not to sell all their coal for energy production.  Actually all met producers would.  I doubt very much that will happen, and you should realize it won't either.

 

You said their plant was designed moreso for thermal, not true.  Their plant is designed for both because they produce both.  If they didn't have the capability for thermal, then the 12% thermal coal produced would not weigh into the bottom line.  It would be a waste.  Not sure what you're getting at.  Enough on this.

 

At least we agree that the plant is designed to produce both met coal and thermal as it should be. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse