While Holcapek gleefully maximized resource numbers in the first in-house NI 43-101 and some posters here are now minimizing resource numbers, (claiming said resources are now worthless due to McBride's NI 43-101, telling us to sell at a substantial loss and move on to something else) investors are presented with a dillema. Below are a couple of articles that discuss and project silver and gold values in a realistic manner.
Keep in mind, the value of silver and gold, while pegged to the value of the USD, do not lose value because the USD loses value. The printing of endless amounts of US dollars reduces the value of the USD, not so with silver and gold. An ounce of silver and/or gold is still an ounce of silver and/or gold, regardless of what the USD does.
The so called value of the USD is based upon the USA honoring redemption value of its currency, nothing more. Adding zeros to the quantity of US dollars available does not raise the value of the currency, it merely increases the burden of honoring redemption value. Meanwhile ounces of silver and gold are static, they are still ounces of silver and gold.
Silver Demand In China For Wealth Protection To Climb to Record 7,700 Tons
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-10-25/silver-demand-china-wealth-protection-climb-record-7700-tons
https://www.silverseek.com/commentary/silver-demand-money-versus-commodity-7406
HSBC Chief Commodities Analyst: Gold to $1900 By End 2012
https://www.silverdoctors.com/hsbc-chief-commodities-analyst-gold-to-1900-by-end-2012/#more-16775