Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Orbite Technologies Inc EORBF

Orbite Technologies Inc is a Canada-based mineral-processing and resource development company. The firm is organised into the following segments; Specialty Products, Waste Monetization and Commodity Minerals. It produces alumina, silica, hematite, magnesium oxide, titanium oxide, smelter-grade alumina, rare earth oxides and rare metal oxides. The operation plant is based in Canada.


GREY:EORBF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Art365on Jan 30, 2013 11:40am
140 Views
Post# 20911680

RE: AMMG = HPA from Kaolin

RE: AMMG = HPA from Kaolin

Seems to make more sense that to produce it from Grande Valee clay.
The Al content is significantly higher and there should be much less impurities that have to be dealt with.

Deposit-wise, AMMG seems to have quite an edge over Orbite.
Technology-wise I can not judge.
It is as difficult for them as it is for ORT to come up with a viable and feasible processing plant that consistently yields a marketable product.

 

I can't judge either technology-wise, but I can judge if a text is written with an honest frame of mind. Your text is absolute denialism. Every single sentence, the last being probably the most perfect example: you pretend (out of nowhere) that ORT has difficulties with its patented technology by making a comparison with a company that hasn't even started to develop its own! In the process, you put both companies at the same stage of development (is is as difficult for them as it is for ORT).

 

Bullboard Posts