GREY:EORBF - Post by User
Comment by
hellohellokittyon Jan 26, 2015 12:41pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
148 Views
Post# 23363843
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Glen Kelly mascarade about responsability
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Glen Kelly mascarade about responsabilityA supplier (ie not Orbite itseft) had some delays in their delivery. This doesn't imply in any way that the HPA2 plant is a failure.
If that would be the case then that means all the companies on this planet are failures because at some point some of their suppliers had delays.
Nakate wrote:
hellohellokitty wrote: These are total lies. HPA2 has not failed at all. You are just writing this in the hope newcomers will just read your post and not bother doing their own research and look at the company's website:
https://www.orbitealuminae.com/English/Home/default.aspx
princeofcut wrote: naka, the new plan = HPA3 and not HPA2, and HPA2 failed (the design didn't work it seems) and so in a bob and weave move GK adds a whole lot more to get to HPA3.. it is a mess no matter what... i wonder if GK offered to resign (he should've IMO) as his HPA2 plan failed
Yep hpa2 failed as in we are still waiting for some dust to be excreded out of the business end of working refinery that was supposed to be done by now = fail. Also we are still waitng for Veolia to step up and commit to a rmr site, that also gets a fail. These are not positives and the share price reflects this inability to complete.