Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

AgriMinco Corp ETPHF

AgriMinco Corp is engaged in the development, exploration, and evaluation of agricultural and industrial mineral projects across Africa. The company's project profile includes Southern Togo, Bassar, Danakil, and Oglat and Taoudenni.


GREY:ETPHF - Post by User

Comment by invest_1on Nov 18, 2011 10:47am
155 Views
Post# 19248494

RE: All core samples???

RE: All core samples??? My understanding was that as of about two weeks ago, a total of 17 holes were completed. Five of which had samples sent to S. Africa. Due to the delays, they decided to change labs. Whether they'd send 5 from SA and the 12 newer from Ethiopia, is the question.The explanation given doesn't clearly explain the exact details, but it's the best I can piece together. =============================The issue at stake here I trust, is that IF they are sending material that was in South Africa, technically speaking FED lost Chain of Custody and there for the Integrity of the cores could be challenged. As such questionable if test results from said cores would be legally acceptable to be included in a 43-101?========================= Who's to say the SA Lab was not upset at losing the contract and did not pissed on the cores or worst ? Chain of custody is at issue here. Cores from how many holes have been sent to SA and could possibly be challenged or simply rejected by Erco ?????
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse