Post by
Sasha11 on Apr 28, 2022 6:26am
Sorry Dudes
Sorry but no way that nickel grade will economically support battery grade nickel production. Even ferro nickel with the capital and infrastructure required is a hypothetical stretch. Save your shareholders some grief, look for nickel in the nickel belts, which is not here.
Comment by
Sasha11 on Apr 28, 2022 7:24pm
of coarse the initial grade is relevant, and this would be the lowest grade nickel mine on the planet. Also very hard rock and fine grind needed at huge tonnages for this property. The ferronickel concentrate produced is much more difficult and expensive to leach and then make precip. Happy to be proven wrong; show the economics before hyping the stock.
Comment by
N3tPr0phet on Apr 28, 2022 9:02pm
The PEA already shows some of the most robust economics of any junior nickel project, does it not?
Comment by
N3tPr0phet on May 17, 2022 1:17pm
FPX also put out a PEA. Despite the lower grade, it has a significantly higher NPV than that released by CNC, even though it uses more conservative assumptions (CNC assumes co-located steel mill, FPX doesn't provide for byproduct credits).
Comment by
Sasha11 on May 18, 2022 11:17am
you talked 90% recovery to nickel grade battery material. Not true and not in the PEA. You are trying to ride a band wagon FPX will never be on. The PEA assumes infrastructure mainly power will be provided. It wont be up there for many many years.
Comment by
N3tPr0phet on May 18, 2022 12:46pm
The project is 110km from BC Hydro's grid and part of the initial capex provides for connecting to this. They aren't assuming that power just appears like mana from heaven.