OTCPK:GBGPF - Post by User
Comment by
dogger05on Nov 26, 2017 10:15am
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
55 Views
Post# 27033122
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Who thinks ACB is OVERVALUED?
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Who thinks ACB is OVERVALUED?Stonyguy wrote: VENMan wrote: Stonyguy - (11/25/2017 9:42:50 PM) RE:RE:Who thinks ACB is OVERVALUED?
VENMan Could you please provide comparison, using the same logic for CMED?
I can understand your valuation when put it in those terms and compared side by side. Personally I have to take the impact sky will have on the Aurora valuations. I read a post recently the opened my eyes. The potential impact of revenues 100,000Kg will do. So in perfect world, 1,000,000,000, grams sold at today’s average selling price of $7.32/g Sky alone will generate $732M. This is certainly playing a role in the accelerated SP ACB has experienced on the last few weeks, and will only continue.
Sure:
CMED has a price of $20.65 and 23 million common stock. So CMED has a Market Cap of $474M if CMED shareholders took that money and put it into a 20 year Triple A Bond which earns 3.63% they would earn $17.21M. So the Assets of CMED would have to earn more than $17.21M in the near future for this company to be fairly valued. Even at $20.65 it's a much more reasonable expectation than ACB at $105M. You have to understand that CMED share price is inflated do to this current offer. If you bought CMED at $10 per share their market cap would have been $230 Million and a 20 year Triple A bond would earn you $8.28 Million a year. Buying CMED at $10 was good value because their was a resaonable expectation that they could earn $8M a year. ALL IMO! DYODD!
A
What about Cmed oil facility that is under construction that can produce the equivalent of a 12 million 60ml bottles of oil....guess how much eev be that is at even just 80 dollars per bottle?