Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Resource Capital Gold Corp GDPEF

RF Capital Group Inc is a financial services firm. The company's operating segment includes Wealth Management and Corporate. It generates maximum revenue from the Wealth Management segment. The operations segment provides carrying broker services to third parties, including trade execution, clearing, and settlement services.


GREY:GDPEF - Post by User

Comment by LeftBookon Feb 02, 2019 9:25am
43 Views
Post# 29309611

RE:RE:recovery at Dufferin 4.17g/t or 5.1g/t?

RE:RE:recovery at Dufferin 4.17g/t or 5.1g/t?
Lockdown, I agree. 
 
Some ore will be better. Some ore will be worse.
According to the PEA there should be better ore overall.
 
My read of the PEA is the overall diluted grade is 6.83 g/t.
But, I am not sure if the 6.83g/t diluted grade of the PEA is the proper comparable to the recovery grade presented in the news item.
 
 
---
 
 
A separate issue is a discrepancy between the news item of 4.17g/t and 5.1g/t in the MD&A. The numbers should be the same if they refer to the same material processed, supposedly bulk sampling numbers.
 
One explaination is 4.17g/t is from the bulk sampling only and 5.1g/t is from 
all material processed, say, including stockpiled material. But, given the similarity of the ounces processed (5,846oz and 5,944oz) I suspect a typo.

I am not concerned that the numbers are lower than the PEA but that there is discrepancy in the reporting of g/t for what seems to be similar ounces. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse