Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Geologix Explorations Inc GIXEF



GREY:GIXEF - Post by User

Comment by 2investorknoton Apr 15, 2016 12:46pm
220 Views
Post# 24771730

RE:RE:look at those assumptions again

RE:RE:look at those assumptions again
Thanks for the information though I was just responding to the recent post citing those figures. 

My point being (whether using either of the 3 or 4 rolling average prices) is that the IRR figure being stated needs to be re-examined by shareholders in light of the current and projected copper prices for the next few years.  Its easy to focus on a high IRR figure but are the earlier assumptions still valid?  Who knows where gold will go though in the next year.  Maybe we will all get lucky.

GLTA 

 

 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>