Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gluskin Shefff Associates Inc. GLUSF



GREY:GLUSF - Post by User

Comment by rodbharon Nov 29, 2018 2:20pm
92 Views
Post# 29040954

RE:RE:Fund Performance

RE:RE:Fund PerformanceThis info should be in the annual reports because it is critical for shareholders to see how the funds are performing relative to benchmark. The fact they don't put it in anymore sugests that results are not good. And if they are lagging their benchmarks I would not be that surprised. The fees they charge are out of line--1 to 1.5% base fees and substantial performance fees on top of that. Given they manage $9 billion I doubt they can overcome that fee drag. To keep this business going long term they may be forced to cut their fees drastically. I think that their current earnings are not sustainable.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>