Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Goldsource Mines Inc GXSFF


Primary Symbol: V.GXS

Goldsource Mines Inc. is a Canada-based resource company, which is engaged in exploration activities. The Company is focused on the Eagle Mountain Gold Project (Eagle Mountain) for which it has a 100% interest in the Eagle Mountain Prospecting License (EMPL) and the Kilroy Mining Permit (collectively, the Property). The Property is located approximately seven kilometers (km) south of Mahdia Township (population approximately 3000). Mahdia Township can be accessed by road from Georgetown, a driving distance of approximately 325 km, or via air by a commercial flight. The Property consists of an area of approximately 5,050 hectares (ha) (12,480 acres) in central Guyana, South America. 4,784 hectares (11,820 acres) of the Eagle Mountain Property relate to the EMPL while 266 ha (660 acres) relate to the Medium Scale Mining Permit held by Kilroy Mining Inc. (Kilroy), on which the Company has a long-term lease with a 2% net smelter return royalty.


TSXV:GXS - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by HighTeston Apr 08, 2009 10:50am
232 Views
Post# 15904602

RE: RE: RE: RE: Hit and Miss-Kerogen

RE: RE: RE: RE: Hit and Miss-KerogenI'm not an expert, but what does coal with limestone interbeds look like? or with silty beds? or sandy beds? carbonaceous mudstones with coal partings? They will all mess up the seismic interpretation, IMO. And drilling will be required to "truth" any non-invasive techno-based look underground. Now if they do seismic, or whatever, they have a huge database of real logs to compare with. Not some interpreted mumbo-jumbo that can't be reported except as an educated guess, to shareholders.

HT
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse