RE: RE: RE: RE: Hit and Miss-KerogenI'm not an expert, but what does coal with limestone interbeds look like? or with silty beds? or sandy beds? carbonaceous mudstones with coal partings? They will all mess up the seismic interpretation, IMO. And drilling will be required to "truth" any non-invasive techno-based look underground. Now if they do seismic, or whatever, they have a huge database of real logs to compare with. Not some interpreted mumbo-jumbo that can't be reported except as an educated guess, to shareholders.
HT