Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

High River Gold Mines Ltd HRIVF



GREY:HRIVF - Post by User

Comment by hrgagogoon Jun 10, 2009 9:48am
208 Views
Post# 16058014

RE: RE: United effort

RE: RE: United effortNC, if 65M is needed to block, and the stockhouse board has 17 and 9 institutions have 76, are you indicating that you do not know which way these institutions will vote.  If logic stands, would they not vote against, which would indicate that there is enough to  block.  These institutions bought above $1.00, so logic would indicate that they would try and get more than just .22.  Am I missing something?  By the way, have you received your package for the AGM, I have not.  It is usually sent by my broker, but have received it.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>