Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

High River Gold Mines Ltd HRIVF



GREY:HRIVF - Post by User

Comment by WolfgangEon Jul 29, 2012 7:29pm
240 Views
Post# 20163706

RE: RE: Press Release re: Nord's HRG offer

RE: RE: Press Release re: Nord's HRG offer

The comparisons of Nord vs HRG have been done already ad nauseum.  I am trying to keep it as brief as possible in order to make my point:

Nord:  4.80 recent quote   359 M shares, of which 10.9% are float for 1.72 B $ CAP

HRG:  Now 1.43 recent quote, 840M shares float approx 1/4 of that, say 210 M sahers, for a cap of 1.18 B $

At present the Mordy offer would translate into either swapping 3.5 shares of HRG for each NORD share for a present value of 1.37 per HRG share.

The other option allows for 1.40 cash per HRG share,  now approx 1.42 or 1.43 per share,  thus already a 5c premium over the Mordy offer.

Chris suggested to seek to improve the share swap to 3.0 shares of HRG from 3.5 which would value HRG as 1.60 per share.

2011 net profit of HRG was 170.4 or 20c per share, 1st Q of 2012 was 57.6 M  or 7c for the Q vs 37.3 M for 1st Q of 2011 (5c/share).  Annualised that would be 28c net profit or at 1.40 a PE of 5.0

2011 net profit of NORD was 251 M $, 1st Q of 2012 was 60 M (essentially all contributed by HRG) .

Without going into any more details it becomes clear that HRG is considerably superior to NORD.  Even when looked at as an even comparison,  359 M shares of Nord would be then equivalent to 840 M shares of HRG or a ratio of  1: 2.34 or say 4.80/2.34 = 2.05 for each HRG share,  plus the cash & equivalent value of 320 M $ (including 150 M $ lent to NORD by HRG) for another 38 c  per share plus 50% of Prognoz, say another 25 c or so for a total value of  2.68 $ per HRG share,  and NOT 1.40.

You and I know though that Mordy would NEVER go for that, so we are kind of stuck. Either accept something totally inferior or dig our heels in.  What's Your thought on this?

I have been terribly disappointed by Chris latest interpretation which suggests that he could be satisfied with an HRG valuation of 1.60 for a 1:3 swap arrangement.  Why would I want to swap one terribly undervalued Mordashov controlled company stock for another one equally controlled by him, the second richest man in  Russia, worth about 20 +  Bill $, and helping him that way to make another Bill $ or so to our detriment.

The key question we have to ask ourselves is:  What other choices do we have, considering our toothless 

SEC for the TSX, no less.  And Mordy knows that so he plays them like the first fiddle and he may well get away with it yet again.

Comments please,

My 2c worth,  Wolf E

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>