Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

High River Gold Mines Ltd HRIVF



GREY:HRIVF - Post by User

Comment by tryteon Nov 02, 2012 9:14am
288 Views
Post# 20553950

RE: The End Game

RE: The End Game

I'm sorry, but i disagree. What you are suggesting is that one large (likely institutional) shareholder that has already decided to commit to our cause and turn down the offer, would instead possibly take an illegal deal?

Do you know of ONE shareholder that has roughly 45M shares that would give Nord the majority of minority shares? That is what Nord will require to make this happen in the subsequent amalgation attempt. Nord would likely have to make a deal with multiple shareholders to get that many shares. 

On top of all this, why would they have not already done this? They have already completed lock up deals with all the shareholders that have ties to Mordy. The rest of shareholders (retail and institutional) have already shown their cards by not committing to a lock up agreement.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>