GREY:IVITF - Post by User
Comment by
portfoliobuildon Dec 01, 2016 5:25pm
![](https://assets.stockhouse.com/kentico-cms/0342-00/images/Sprite.svg#id_Post_Views_Icon)
56 Views
Post# 25543161
RE:RE:RE:RE:nope: the contrary opinion is a must on these CSE deals
RE:RE:RE:RE:nope: the contrary opinion is a must on these CSE dealsat the risk of this sounding like a peeing match.... you analysis sounds like your in the coolaid bowl.... in a high growth space you dont reward shareholders by giving away $1m you invest the $1M and create ridiculous returns for all shareholders..... this is a basic capital allocation decision..... thats just non-sense.... its pretty much indefensible...
Paul Sparks... ok maybe hes a great lobbyist... IMD.... needs growth not lobbyists....IMD will not influence the MJ legislative process, its a pimple on the elephants butt....
The board has no track record creating wealth. an old mayor of Prince George? where the hell is Prince George? and a kinesiologist...... ????? what??????
the reason people go on the advisory board is that they dont want the fiduciary obligations = (read this a risk) of being on the Board.... its actually a warning sign....
when your a pretty girl,..... the attractive guy (talent) come running to a money making opportunity.......
again... take some profit...you wont be sorry .... for the record I have no position in this stock i just picked up the story and looked into it........ then i checked the cool aid bowl and saw you guys swimming in it... and I thought its a good time for a contrarian in here.......
make money, preserve your capital, and make more money..... take some profit