Post by
Mopoke on Dec 19, 2014 9:55pm
Cash Flow should be the key focus on LOY
Hi All,
I'm trying to make sense of the post on Seeking Alpha (link below) vs my valuation of the business. Below is a bit of a brain dump.
The analyst on Seeking Alpha has done some comprehensive work and values the business at $1.05 based on 10.5x FY15 EBITDA of $19m. I see two problems with this approach (outlined below) and think a DCF or cash flow multiple is better.
Based on my numbers, normalised CF for Loyalist is somewhere around $5m - $6m (growing organically and through acquisitions). Based on the current EV of $70m implies a cash flow multiple of 12x - 14x.
If you run the numbers vs peers and businesses of similar size and growth, I think this is fair.
Feedback and criticism welcome.
My views on Seeking Alpha's EBITDA multiple valuation
https://seekingalpha.com/article/2717195-loyalist-group-ltd-continues-its-aggressive-growth-and-announces-record-earnings
Outlined below are my views based on my own calculations. I do not own any LOY.
1. EBITDA of $19m appears high
- LOY's current run-rate revenue is around $70m (FY14)
- 15% EBITDA margin puts the the run-rate EBITDA around $10m
- Ignoring acquisitions (however likely) and assuming the business can do another 10% organic growth next year gives us +$1m of EBITDA
- CFO believes the business can get $3.2m of EBITDA from the South Korea acquisition and lets say that in FY15 they can get +$2m of this total
- Total EBITDA based on the above assumptions gives a number around $13m
- If the the $6m gap (vs Seeking Alpha) were to come from acquisitions, it would require a lot of capital to be deployed (greater than new debt facility)
2. EBITDA is not the right number to be looking at
- If you check the SEDAR filings for the business, you can see the business is not only capital intensive in acquisitions, but is also capital intensive in the underlying business
- This is due to three elements (capex, integration expenses, working cap)
- It looks likes FY14 organic capital expenditure will be around $3m (including textbook project), and lets conservatively keep this number going forward (around 4% of sales)
- The integration expenses are around $1m - $2m per annum (redundacies etc.)
- Working capital is a big cash drain in the business, and based on my numbers runs at $1m - $2m per annum (probably driven by the Saudi students)
- Lastly, business lets assume normalised tax payments of another $1m - $2m
- All in all, the cash outflows of the business are around $6m - $7m
- This gives a normalised cash flow number of around $5m - $6m (vs $13m of EBITDA)
Comment by
60606060 on Dec 19, 2014 10:31pm
Now in summary what do you want to say or project. Thanks.
Comment by
wpgweatherman on Dec 20, 2014 6:58am
Agree.. And I will add the market is always correct. If this stock was worth more it would be priced higher.
Comment by
60606060 on Dec 20, 2014 9:05pm
Man you are posting at 5:00 A.M. ET. I assume you live in the UK. It's nice to get a rational thought on this board.
Comment by
alister33 on Dec 23, 2014 7:48pm
Revenues and cash flow will be rising ....
Comment by
Yun321 on Dec 23, 2014 9:50pm
" Revenues and cash flow will be rising .... " But stock price is low