Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."


GREY:LSTMF - Post by User

Comment by orlandoflon May 24, 2016 4:43pm
156 Views
Post# 24900792

RE:RE:RE:Cash flows on oil price and exchange rate improvements

RE:RE:RE:Cash flows on oil price and exchange rate improvements
blade86ca wrote: Fully Agree, Wright thought he could get CPG to pay more for Bakken even after I remember Saxberg publicy saying at that time they were very interested in LTS assests ( Bakken in paticular ).

I am sure at the time Wright must have thought oil prices will be back above 100$ in no time flat and did absolutely nothing ( aside from collect his salary ) to protect LTS balance sheet and lower debt levels at the time when lots and lots of other companies were doing just that. The creditors and bond holders will very soon own this stock.  

Wright is the best definition of a "reactive" manager and not a "proactive" manager. Always reacting after the market has moved and affected LTS and not before.


they should have cut the dividend right away and paid on debt - it was around 8 cents a month or so - I can't rember - that could have been $160M a month toward debt - or paid off in a year and they could have survived - dumb.

CPG finally cut dividend and I'm glad for it so they can work on paying down debt as they have a lot of debt also - but a lot of production and seems better operations
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse