Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."


GREY:LSTMF - Post by User

Comment by oilwatcher13on Jul 29, 2016 10:35am
202 Views
Post# 25095439

RE:RE:RE:LMAO.... CREDITORS ARE NEVER GOING TO AGREE...!!!!

RE:RE:RE:LMAO.... CREDITORS ARE NEVER GOING TO AGREE...!!!!Highrider read it and weep...!!!!

That’s not the case for Jason Mudrick. The chief investment officer at Mudrick Capital Management LP is sending distress signals about the firm’s holdings in unsecured debt of Lightstream Resources Ltd. As things stand, those holdings would be almost wiped out by a rescue plan designed to cut debt by $904 million for the Canadian oil producer.

The plan pits Mudrick’s $1.3 billion hedge fund against some of the world’s biggest distressed-debt investors at Apollo Global Management LLC and Blackstone Group LP’s GSO Capital, who he said negotiated the plan privately with management to get majority ownership.

 

Such conflicts are becoming more frequent as junk-bond defaults hover at the highest levels in six years, spurring companies to work out deals that avoid bankruptcy. Smaller bondholders that started out in senior positions are finding themselves frozen out of talks and pushed toward the back of the line for repayment when a company becomes distressed and turns to investors with deeper pockets. Holders have also disputed restructurings this year at Cliffs Natural Resources Inc., Vanguard Natural Resources LLC and Chesapeake Energy Corp.

“Larger distressed-debt funds will likely continue to be in the driver’s seat when it comes to the negotiation of plans of arrangement that suit their interests, to the detriment of the often smaller, unsecured creditors,” said Kyle Kashuba, a partner focused on financial insolvency and corporate restructuring in the Calgary office of law firm Norton Rose Fulbright.

Similar issues arose in U.S. courts in the case of Education Management Corp., a for-profit college owned by private equity giant KKR & Co. Bondholders including Marblegate Asset Management claimed they were wrongly stripped of interest and principal on about $20.3 million in notes after they objected to an out-of-court restructuring. The company argued changes are allowed if the interest and principal aren’t altered, but a judge ruled last year for the investors; an appeal is pending.

The concern is that more companies may wind up in bankruptcy if every investor is required to sign off on a deal, according to a report last year by Mitchell Seider, an attorney at Latham & Watkins. In the U.S., the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 theoretically protects investors in these clashes, requiring an independent trustee for the benefit of all parties. Private-equity firms such as Apollo and KKR tried last year to amend the law to make it harder for certain bondholders to challenge out-of-court accords, Bloombergreported.

 

Disputed Claims

Mudrick is fuming because he says Lightstream is recognizing invalid claims from Apollo and GSO that resulted from a previous debt swap last year that also excluded his firm. In a July 14 letter to Lightstream’s board, a lawyer representing Mudrick, Daniel Fliman, said Lightstream engaged in “backroom negotiations” with Apollo and GSO, which he called “notoriously aggressive hedge funds” intent on stripping value from unsecured holders. Lightstream Chief Executive Officer John Wright didn’t keep a promise to avoid a contested reorganization and negotiated exclusively with Apollo and GSO, Fliman wrote.

The latest restructuring agreement “reeks of conflict of interest,” Mudrick said in an interview, citing terms that include retaining Wright and letting equity holders keep some of their stake even as bondholders get shortchanged. He’s been joined in opposition by another hedge fund, FrontFour Capital Group LLC of Greenwich, Connecticut.

 

Representatives for Apollo, FrontFour and Calgary-based Lightstream didn’t respond to inquiries; Blackstone declined to comment. Lightstream has said that last year’s debt swap was allowed by terms of the bonds, and complaints by the dissenters were without merit. Apollo manages about $173 billion in assets and Blackstone, founded by Stephen Schwarzman, has $340 billion, according to their websites.

 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>