Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Marlin Gold Mining MALZF

Marlin Gold Mining Ltd is engaged in the exploration, development and production of gold and silver in the Americas. The company owns three properties located in Mexico and the USA and a portfolio of royalties. Its properties portfolio includes Commonwealth project, Arizona, United States; Gavilanes Project, Durango, Mexico; and La Trinidad Mine, Sinaloa, Mexico.

OTCPK:MALZF - Post Discussion

Marlin Gold Mining > Worlds Lowest Cost Produer?
View:
Post by k22k22 on Jan 18, 2017 2:00am

Worlds Lowest Cost Produer?

Cash cost is the basic metric, it's the cost at the mine site, does not include corporate costs, debt, etc..... To find the true cost you have to scrutinize the financial statement, 1st quarter statement for 2017 will tell the truth on that. But let's look at the lowest cost producer in the world for 2016, Polyus Gold coming in at $400 an ounce, Total Cash Cost, that just means mine site cost and corporate costs. I can't see marlin adding another $150 an ounce just for head office costs so my question now is, "Is Marling Gold now the world's lowest cost gold producer?"
Comment by billybob22 on Jan 18, 2017 11:13am
if you listen to the CC they said there all in cost is 400 soon tobe below 300 in the first few months of this year. Sounds to good tobe true but I'm taking a shot.
Comment by k22k22 on Jan 19, 2017 3:11am
Haven't listened to the CC yet due to present location and bandwidth restrictions. Last year Barrick was labelled the lowest all in cost producer at $706 an ounce. Marlin has been flying under the radar but if their all in cost is now $400 then I think they are about to get noticed. How is it even possible to get the all in cost down to 400 let alone 300? That's insane compared to other ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities