So - what were shareholders waiting upon ? If you said... Herradura assay's you'd be correct
Here they are....
- 34.4% copper + 305 g/t silver across 0.5-metre of continuous outcrop Herradura;
-
- 16.0% copper + 146 g/t silver over 4-metre by 1-metre open Herradura*;
- 14.2% copper + 215 g/t silver over 0.6-metre open Herradura*;
- 13.5% copper + 95 g/t silver over 0.8-metre open Herradura*;
- 12.1% copper + 89 g/t silver over 1-metre open Herradura*;
- 6.3% copper + 46 g/t silver over 2.0-metre open Herradura*;
- 4.4% copper + 33 g/t silver over 3-metre open Herradura*;
- 6.6% copper + 95 g/t silver over 0.3-metre open Herradura*;
- 5.0% copper + 28 g/t silver over 1-metre open Herradura*;
- 4.9% copper + 42 g/t silver over 0.2-metre open Herradura*;
- 4.6% copper + 21 g/t silver over 0.2-metre open Ventana*;
- 4.4% copper + 37 g/t silver over 0.2-metre open Herradura*;
- 4.0% copper + 36 g/t silver over 1.2-metre open Herradura*;
- 3.7% copper + 22 g/t silver over 0.5-metre open Ventana*;
- 3.3% copper + 18 g/t silver over 0.8-metre open Ventana*.
GOOGLE MAP Sabana El Medio = Herradura = Compare google map with Max's map below
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Sabana+El+Medio,+Barrancas,+La+Guajira,+Colombia/@11.0168333,-72.6465165,4956m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x8e8ba8a6d14ffea1:0x66d4df046c2a4144!8m2!3d11.009422!4d-72.6324391 Now ask...
what's the difference between booking formation and thrust mound formation ?
Booking = stacked layers in sheets = easily seen on google maps
Now - if this is a sedimentry blanket sheet mineralization....
Only 2m thick - and if the sheet was once flat -
And later with siesmic pushing - formed a booking mound - such as Sabana El Mido
Then...could one use a folded piece of paper = make a zylophone to represent the booking ?
IF A ZYLOPHONE COULD BE USED AS AN EXAMPLE -
Then...how thick would the booking be - if it stacked itself in layers ?
What if the 2m sheet stacked itself 50m high ?
Then the next booking stacked itself against the first book another 50m high but 2m thick ?
Then the next layer, and the next layer, and so on....
Theoretically - the 100m mound would have a 100m depth - right ?
If i were to focus on the Sabano El Mino - is dimensions are
2km x 2km - i don't know the hieght
In the map below - Max shows where threy sampled for copper + silver
Very close to Cerrejon -
In fact one can see the road that goes between Cerrejon mine - right ot the doorsteps of,
Sabina....talk about convenient -
So... what i'd lik to see is - Max putting out a map that shows the sampled results - and their locations on the map below -
Just that one little area -
2km x 2km could be a terrific spot for the junior to focus on ...
2000m x 2000m x ( sippose 50m high ) x 2.5 ( ore weight )
Then... scan the grades above - yip... Max should build out this 2km x 2km square area...
This one zone coulkd stack up alot of tonnage
And if hte ores are endowed with silver and copper
it would certainly make this shareholder very happy...
Pull the south AM team and Put both teams on this one Sabina range
build out the 2km x2km - could translate into 500/million tonnes
if the booking is from top to bottom - this woulod be some serious tonnage
more intel is needed - to know for certain if the booking was once a 2m sheet
now folded and stacked... it could mean solid booking
and if the mineralization is similar to the above recent samples...
hello.... If there's a buckle thrust below - i would think the booking would not have formed
there would be a simple mound - a thrust bulge but no booking...
hence - the importance of - layered booking formations
Signed, Wango, Nuggetz
Cheers...