RE:RE:The Fault of PaulTrusted91 wrote: Paul is the CEO of a very successful business with a strong and growing core business along with a game changing technology Biocloud. As an investor you should actually look at the facts and assess the current and future potential of the business which IMO is very positive. I prefer that the CEO spends their time and focus on running/building the business (which if you have done some DD you would see that Paul has done exactly that)
There is no need for any CEO and especially in this instance to have a play by play provided to the investors! When there is material (positive or negative)news it will always be shared and in the meantime just trust your investment IMO
it is however a personal choice
I won't speak for others but I don't care if PG doesn't give us a constant play by play. What I would like to see instead of the constant black hole of vital information is some indication of how successful (or otherwise) BioCloud is on an ongoing basis. I've said a couple of times that we should be getting monthly sales updates for a product as novel and untested (by the marketplace) as this one is. That would take a secretary five minutes to put together, and their PR person could slap it into a NR or even a tweet in another five minutes. Most people aren't invested in KNR because of the core business. PG either knows this or is incredibly stupid given the share price was going nowhere before BioCloud. Given further how many millions of dollars those new shareholders have added to his and other insiders' personal fortunes by pushing the stock price up, I think he owes at least 10 minutes of his company's time per month to keep those investors apprised of what's happening.