Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Kontrol Technologies Corp N.KNR

Alternate Symbol(s):  KNRLF

Kontrol Technologies Corp. is a Canadian company, which is engaged in smart buildings and cities through Internet of things (IoT), cloud and software as a service (SaaS) technology. The Company provides solutions and services to its customers to improve energy management, monitor continuous emissions and accelerate the sustainability of all buildings. It aggregates data generated by IoT devices in cloud-based management and analytics services. This allows remote devices to be monitored and controlled by facilities managers via smartphones and tablets. The Company has collected and analyzed approximately 15 billion data records across various buildings. It is developing a suite of IOT devices, including the Smart EMS and various related sensors to connect buildings and make them intelligent. It provides in-suite building automation solutions and can be integrated into existing building automation systems.


NEO:KNR - Post by User

Comment by Mostlyseriouson Nov 30, 2022 8:01am
89 Views
Post# 35138975

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Interesting

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:InterestingIf PG screwed up the commercialization of your product, why didn't you design it with less computer chips at the time of the computer chip shortage and why was the first cartridge only good for one use?  Why didn't the design allow for lowering the price if the price was the problem?  Engineerimg plays into costs, costs play into pricing....cannot completely split the two. What was the cost anyways?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>