RE: RE: RE: technical stuff and mobile operator anHello,
I've never said that NEOM have the patent in Japan for some tecnologie they use over there. In fact, Mobikyo seem to do very well with their Indirect method that has nothing to do with NEOM and it's and it is exactly one on other fact that which raises my question.
More I do research, less I understand why a NeO still OTC. On the one hand,
they having Neoreader which is compatible with several brands of cell phones,
They Gavitec AG Gavitec will produce and distribute XELIA, a bar code reader that incorporates Adaptus Imaging Technology (Honeywell) to enable high-performance reading of 2D bar codes, including Data Matrix and Aztec codes. Than why they still on OTC?
In fact, I really try to understand the same as Huppo on InvestorsHub trying himself to understand
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=36923
Make no mistake, I am not trying to shoot down NEOMA in any way. ... but I am trying
to understand exactly how effective mobile advertising to NEEDS
make use of NEOMA's patents. Someone thinking of investing in NEOMA
and doing research can easily get the idea that there's no way to
link to a web site from a bar code using a cell phone without
somehow making use of NEOMA's patents and that's just plain false.
All I'm trying to do is get a realistic impression of NEOMA's
importance by weighing all the factors.
Are we just two person who may think this way about NEO?
All the best
Theres